Contabo vs Netcup 2026: Cheap Shared CPU vs Dedicated Cores

By Marcus Tran · Updated 2026 · tracking the low-end market since 2018

Affiliate disclosure: provider links below are affiliate links. This comparison is built from community reporting (LowEndTalk), each provider's published terms, and their official 2026 pricing.

These two German-market budget hosts get compared constantly, usually by someone who bought Contabo for its incredible RAM-per-dollar and then hit a performance wall. But most comparisons get one thing wrong: that wall is usually not the disk anymore. Contabo's NVMe line is fast; only its old SSD line is throttled. The real reason to look at Netcup is the part Contabo can't fix with a faster disk, its shared, oversold CPU. This is a comparison about cheap shared CPU vs guaranteed dedicated cores, and which one your workload actually needs.

30-second answer: Contabo (~$4.50/mo) if you want the most RAM/storage per dollar and your workload tolerates variable CPU, just pick its NVMe line so the disk isn't a problem. Netcup RS (~€12.79/mo) if you need guaranteed, consistent CPU: its Root Server line offers dedicated cores, where Contabo's shared CPU gets oversold (users report 20-50% steal on busy nodes). The decider isn't disk anymore, it's whether your workload can live with CPU that's sometimes contended.

Head-to-head at a glance

ContaboNetcup (RS line)
Entry price~$4.50/mo (Cloud VPS 10)~€12.79/mo incl VAT (~$14) (RS 1000 G12)
Entry specs4 vCPU / 8GB / 75GB NVMe4 dedicated cores / 8GB DDR5 / 256GB NVMe
CPUShared, steal reports 20-50% on busy nodesMarketed as dedicated cores; EPYC 9645 (Turin/Zen 5) on G12
DiskNVMe line fast (33k-46k IOPS); old SSD line throttled ~1,300Unthrottled NVMe (no documented IOPS cap)
RAM per dollarUnmatchedGood, but you pay more
StorageLarge allocations cheap256GB NVMe at entry (generous)
BillingFlexible; setup fee on VPS 10 short terms (2026)12-month minimum term, no setup fee
SupportBudget-tier; null-route "DDoS protection"Mixed; recurring complaints re: abuse shutdowns
Best forMax RAM/storage per $; CPU-tolerant work (on NVMe line)Work needing guaranteed consistent CPU

What actually drives the migration (it's not disk)

The standard story is "Contabo throttles disk, so people leave." That was true, but it's now half-outdated and worth correcting, because it sends people to the wrong fix. Contabo's disk only throttles on the older SSD line (capped near 1,300 IOPS for years); the NVMe line benchmarks at 33k-46k IOPS, fast. So if disk was your only problem, the fix is cheap and stays within Contabo: pick the NVMe line. You don't need Netcup for that.

The thing a faster disk can't fix, and the real reason people move, is CPU steal. Contabo's CPU is shared and nodes are oversold; users report steal spiking into the 20-50% range during busy hours. That means your box can benchmark fine at 3am and crawl at 3pm, regardless of which disk line you're on. For a workload that needs consistent, predictable CPU (a busy database, a site under steady load, anything latency-sensitive), no Contabo plan solves that, because it's a property of how Contabo sells the hardware, not of your specific box. That's the genuine "Contabo alternative" trigger, and it's a CPU problem, not an IOPS one.

What Netcup offers instead

Netcup's Root Server (RS) line is the natural landing spot for the CPU-steal problem, and its pitch is the inverse of Contabo's. Where Contabo sells quantity on shared, oversold CPU, Netcup markets dedicated cores, the whole point being that no noisy neighbor can steal your cycles. The entry RS 1000 G12 is 4 dedicated cores, 8GB DDR5 ECC, and 256GB NVMe; the G12 generation runs on AMD's EPYC 9645 (Turin / Zen 5). Community benchmark runs (YABS/Geekbench) generally show the dedicated-core RS holding consistent single-core performance where shared vCPU plans sag under contention, which is exactly the consistency Contabo's oversold nodes can't promise.

Two honest caveats, because Netcup isn't flawless. First, "dedicated cores" is Netcup's marketing framing, and while the community broadly accepts the RS line performs like dedicated, some users question how strictly 1:1 the pinning is, treat it as "explicitly not throttled like Contabo/Hetzner shared," which is the part that's clear. Second, Netcup's support draws recurring complaints, particularly abuse-triggered account shutdowns with slow response and, in some Trustpilot reports, servers deleted without a clear final warning. It's better hardware, not better hand-holding.

Price & the 2026 increases

The honest price gap: Contabo entry is about $4.50/mo; Netcup's cheapest RS is about €12.79/mo incl. VAT (~$14) on a 12-month term with no setup fee. You're paying roughly 3x, and the thing you're buying with that premium is dedicated cores (guaranteed CPU), not a faster disk, since Contabo's NVMe line already gives you fast disk. So the price question is narrow and clear: is consistent CPU worth ~3x to your workload?

One 2026 wrinkle to factor in: Netcup announced price increases driven by the industry-wide RAM cost surge, +18.51% for existing customers (from May 1, 2026), +24.33% on new orders (from March 19, 2026), and +21.52% on storage (per Netcup's official price-adjustment notice). Hetzner raised prices the same season (effective April 1, 2026). So if you're price-comparing across these hosts in 2026, use current live quotes, the numbers moved this spring across the whole budget tier.

Which to pick, by workload

Bottom line: the old "Contabo throttles disk, escape to Netcup" framing is outdated, Contabo's NVMe line fixed the disk story. The real divide is CPU: Contabo's cheap shared cores get oversold (variable performance), Netcup RS gives you dedicated cores (consistent performance) for roughly 3x the price. So the choice is simple: if your workload tolerates occasionally-contended CPU, Contabo on NVMe is unbeatable value; if it needs guaranteed CPU, that's worth Netcup's premium.

FAQ

Contabo or Netcup, which is better?

Different jobs. Contabo = most RAM/storage per dollar but throttled disk (~4-5 MB/s 4K random), for RAM-bound work. Netcup RS = dedicated cores + unthrottled NVMe for ~3x the price, for databases and I/O-heavy work.

Why do people leave Contabo for Netcup?

The disk IOPS throttle. RAM/cores look great but disk-heavy workloads hit the ~1,300 IOPS ceiling and crawl. Netcup's RS line offers dedicated cores and proper NVMe, so "IOPS refugees" move there.

Is Netcup more expensive than Contabo?

Yes, about 3x. Netcup RS 1000 G12 (~€12.79 incl VAT, ~$14) vs Contabo ~$4.50/mo. You pay for dedicated cores and unthrottled disk, worth it if the workload needs them.

Does Netcup have downsides?

Yes, support draws recurring complaints (abuse-triggered shutdowns, slow response, some reports of servers deleted without clear warning), a 12-month minimum term, and a panel the community considers behind Hetzner's. Better hardware, not better support.